[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240301-sport-bekriegen-5b34fd5a014b@brauner>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 14:39:22 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>
Cc: "Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)" <sforshee@...nel.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>, Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, audit@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/25] evm: add support for fscaps security hooks
> I have seen this policy of adding tests in other subsystems (eBPF),
It makes sense if the drive of the patchset would be IMA/EVM features
not refactoring of existing code.
> Happy to try adding the tests, would appreciate your help to review if
Cool, happy to help review them.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists