lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 15:22:56 +0100
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>, 
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: drop the version constraints for sphinx and dependencies

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 3:39 PM Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...clecom> wrote:
>
>
> On 27/02/2024 14:14, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > As discussed (see Links), there is some inertia to move to the recent
> > Sphinx versions for the doc build environment.
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt b/Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt
> > index 5d47ed443949..1f3b98eee2c9 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt
> > @@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
> > -# jinja2>=3.1 is not compatible with Sphinx<4.0
> > -jinja2<3.1
> > -# alabaster>=0.7.14 is not compatible with Sphinx<=3.3
> > -alabaster<0.7.14
> > -Sphinx==2.4.4
> > +jinja2
> > +alabaster
> > +Sphinx
> >   pyyaml
>
> I know you wrote this as well, but just for the record I tried dropping
> jinja2 from this list and it still pulled it in automatically:

Vegard, I took your suggestion and removed jinja2 from the
requirements.txt in my patch v2:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20240301141800.30218-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/

So, there is no need for any further future one-line deletion patch.

Jonathan, please pick the patch v2.

Lukas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ