linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFT 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for transfer timeouts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:42:22 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for
 transfer timeouts


On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:58:11 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> "i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us" has flaws in itself and the usage here is
> all wrong. The driver doesn't use it as a maximum time for clock
> stretching but the maximum time for a total transfer. We already have
> a binding for the latter. Convert the wrong binding from examples.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>