[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e332979deb70913c2c476a059b09015904a5b007.1709361537.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 13:12:02 +0530
From: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC 5/8] ext4: Adds direct-io atomic writes checks
This patch adds ext4 specific checks for supporting atomic writes
using fsawu (filesystem atomic write unit). We can enable this support
with either -
1. bigalloc on a 4k pagesize system or
2. bs < ps system with -b <BS>
3. filesystems with LBS (large block size) support (future)
Let's use generic_atomic_write_valid() helper for alignment
restrictions checking.
Co-developed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
---
fs/ext4/file.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
index 54d6ff22585c..8e309a9a0bd6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/file.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
@@ -400,6 +400,21 @@ static const struct iomap_dio_ops ext4_dio_write_ops = {
.end_io = ext4_dio_write_end_io,
};
+static bool ext4_dio_atomic_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb,
+ struct iov_iter *from)
+{
+ struct super_block *sb = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp)->i_sb;
+ loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos;
+ unsigned int fsawu_min, fsawu_max;
+
+ if (!ext4_can_atomic_write_fsawu(sb))
+ return false;
+
+ ext4_atomic_write_fsawu(sb, &fsawu_min, &fsawu_max);
+
+ return generic_atomic_write_valid(pos, from, fsawu_min, fsawu_max);
+}
+
/*
* The intention here is to start with shared lock acquired then see if any
* condition requires an exclusive inode lock. If yes, then we restart the
@@ -427,13 +442,19 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from,
loff_t offset;
size_t count;
ssize_t ret;
- bool overwrite, unaligned_io;
+ bool overwrite, unaligned_io, atomic_write;
restart:
ret = ext4_generic_write_checks(iocb, from);
if (ret <= 0)
goto out;
+ atomic_write = iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC;
+ if (atomic_write && !ext4_dio_atomic_write_checks(iocb, from)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
offset = iocb->ki_pos;
count = ret;
@@ -576,8 +597,15 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
iomap_ops = &ext4_iomap_overwrite_ops;
ret = iomap_dio_rw(iocb, from, iomap_ops, &ext4_dio_write_ops,
dio_flags, NULL, 0);
- if (ret == -ENOTBLK)
- ret = 0;
+
+ /* Fallback to buffered-io for non-atomic DIO */
+ if (ret == -ENOTBLK) {
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC)
+ ret = -EIO;
+ else
+ ret = 0;
+ }
+
if (extend) {
/*
* We always perform extending DIO write synchronously so by
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists