lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 22:43:02 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>, 
	robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	andrew@...n.ch, gregory.clement@...tlin.com, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, 
	pavel@....cz, lee@...nel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: dts: marvell: Indicate USB activity on x530

On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 11:48 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 7:24 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 02:42:03PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> > > Use the dot on the 7-segment LED block to indicate USB access on the
> > > x530.
> >
> > As I said, I'm not going to apply this even with Acks.
>
> I guess you should not apply any of the dts patches to the
> auxdisplay tree anyway?

I think it depends. If we got maintainers' Acks, etc, why not? If DT
maintainers think otherwise, then no, we shouldn't.

> > The problem here as I see it is the future decision on how DP should
> > behave like.  If you put this into DT, we will to support this to the end
> > of the platform.
>
> As there exist 7-seg displays (and wirings) with and without DP,
> the 7-seg driver and DT bindings should handle both cases.  How to
> wire/use the DP LED is up to the hardware designer / DTS writer.

Right. But my personal statistics for now is: 100% has DP (out of
about a dozen of different chip + LED combinations). What's yours?

> I agree it's a thin boundary between hardware description and software
> policy, though.  Is that your main concern?

I believe so. Because if we mark DP for use for something else, it
makes it much harder to re-use it as dot/comma later on.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ