[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240304174111.GB31079@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 23:11:11 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vireshk@...nel.org,
quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com, quic_skananth@...cinc.com,
quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com, quic_parass@...cinc.com,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] PCI: qcom: Add ICC bandwidth vote for CPU to PCIe
path
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 09:29:57AM +0530, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
> To access PCIe registers, PCIe BAR space, config space the CPU-PCIe
> ICC (interconnect consumers) path should be voted otherwise it may
> lead to NoC (Network on chip) timeout. We are surviving because of
> other driver vote for this path.
>
> As there is less access on this path compared to PCIe to mem path
> add minimum vote i.e 1KBps bandwidth always.
Please add the info that 1KBps is what shared by the HW team.
>
> When suspending, disable this path after register space access
> is done.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 10f2d0bb86be..a0266bfe71f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie {
> struct phy *phy;
> struct gpio_desc *reset;
> struct icc_path *icc_mem;
> + struct icc_path *icc_cpu;
> const struct qcom_pcie_cfg *cfg;
> struct dentry *debugfs;
> bool suspended;
> @@ -1372,6 +1373,9 @@ static int qcom_pcie_icc_init(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> if (IS_ERR(pcie->icc_mem))
> return PTR_ERR(pcie->icc_mem);
>
> + pcie->icc_cpu = devm_of_icc_get(pci->dev, "cpu-pcie");
> + if (IS_ERR(pcie->icc_cpu))
> + return PTR_ERR(pcie->icc_cpu);
> /*
> * Some Qualcomm platforms require interconnect bandwidth constraints
> * to be set before enabling interconnect clocks.
> @@ -1381,7 +1385,19 @@ static int qcom_pcie_icc_init(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> */
> ret = icc_set_bw(pcie->icc_mem, 0, QCOM_PCIE_LINK_SPEED_TO_BW(1));
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(pci->dev, "failed to set interconnect bandwidth: %d\n",
> + dev_err(pci->dev, "failed to set interconnect bandwidth for pcie-mem: %d\n",
"PCIe-MEM"
> + ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The config space, BAR space and registers goes through cpu-pcie path
> + * Set peak bandwidth to 1KBps as recommended by HW team for this path
> + * all the time.
How about,
"Since the CPU-PCIe path is only used for activities like register
access, Config/BAR space access, HW team has recommended to use a
minimal bandwidth of 1KBps just to keep the link active."
> + */
> + ret = icc_set_bw(pcie->icc_cpu, 0, kBps_to_icc(1));
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(pci->dev, "failed to set interconnect bandwidth for cpu-pcie: %d\n",
> ret);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1573,7 +1589,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> */
> ret = icc_set_bw(pcie->icc_mem, 0, kBps_to_icc(1));
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to set interconnect bandwidth: %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set interconnect bandwidth for pcie-mem: %d\n", ret);
"PCIe-MEM"
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1597,6 +1613,18 @@ static int qcom_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> pcie->suspended = true;
> }
>
> + /* Remove CPU path vote after all the register access is done */
"Remove the vote for CPU-PCIe path now, since at this point onwards, no register
access will be done."
> + ret = icc_disable(pcie->icc_cpu);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to disable icc path of cpu-pcie: %d\n", ret);
"CPU-PCIe"
> + if (pcie->suspended) {
> + qcom_pcie_host_init(&pcie->pci->pp);
Interesting. So if icc_disable() fails, can the IP continue to function?
> + pcie->suspended = false;
> + }
> + qcom_pcie_icc_update(pcie);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1605,6 +1633,12 @@ static int qcom_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> struct qcom_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int ret;
>
> + ret = icc_enable(pcie->icc_cpu);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable icc path of cpu-pcie: %d\n", ret);
"CPU-PCIe"
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists