linux-kernel - Re: [linus:master] [x86/bugs] 6613d82e61: stress-ng.mutex.ops_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a1a2da34-af20-471d-a637-ddd749ce809a@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:58:53 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>,
 Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
 ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [x86/bugs] 6613d82e61: stress-ng.mutex.ops_per_sec
 -7.9% regression

On 3/3/24 21:53, kernel test robot wrote:
> kernel test robot noticed a -7.9% regression of stress-ng.mutex.ops_per_sec on:
> 
> commit: 6613d82e617dd7eb8b0c40b2fe3acea655b1d611 ("x86/bugs: Use ALTERNATIVE() instead of mds_user_clear static key")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master

This _looks_ like noise to me.

Some benchmarks went up, some went down.  The differential profile shows
random gunk that basically amounts to "my computer is slow" because it's
mostly things that change when the result changes, like:

>     182670            +9.0%     199032        stress-ng.mutex.nanosecs_per_mutex

Does anyone think there's something substantial to chase after here?