[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240304181004.GA14180@wunner.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 19:10:04 +0100
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, saulo.alessandre@....jus.br
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] Add support for NIST P521 to ecdsa
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 09:19:55PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> This series adds support for the NIST P521 curve to the ecdsa module
> to enable signature verification with it.
>
> An issue with the current code in ecdsa is that it assumes that input
> arrays providing key coordinates for example, are arrays of digits
> (a 'digit' is a 'u64'). This works well for all currently supported
> curves, such as NIST P192/256/384, but does not work for NIST P521 where
> coordinates are 8 digits + 2 bytes long. So some of the changes deal with
> converting byte arrays to digits and adjusting tests on input byte
> array lengths to tolerate arrays not providing multiples of 8 bytes.
When respinning this series as v5, feel free to add my
Tested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
I cherry-picked the commits from your nist_p521.v5 branch...
https://github.com/stefanberger/linux-ima-namespaces/commits/nist_p521.v5/
..onto my development branch for PCI device authentication...
https://github.com/l1k/linux/commits/doe
..and tested against qemu+libspdm that an emulated NVMe drive
is able to present a valid signature using NIST P521 + SHA384
which can be verified correctly by the kernel.
I needed to fix up two of my patches, one which adds P1363
signature format support to the kernel and another fixup to
add NIST P521 support to the in-kernel SPDM library
(two top-most commits on my above-linked development branch).
I performed this test against your f81547267725 head and notice
that you pushed a new version today (with "curve->nbits == 521"
instead of strcmp), but I'm confident those two small changes
wouldn't alter the outcone, hence my Tested-by stands.
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists