[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89335a8e-4963-4992-a519-b88b15e3ff69@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 20:02:48 +0000
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
CC: "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: mpc: use proper binding for
transfer timeouts
Hi Andi,
On 5/03/24 04:16, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:58:11AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> "i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us" has flaws in itself and the usage here is
>> all wrong. The driver doesn't use it as a maximum time for clock
>> stretching but the maximum time for a total transfer. We already have
>> a binding for the latter. Convert the wrong binding from examples.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
>> index 70fb69b923c4..b1d7d14c0be4 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mpc.yaml
>> @@ -96,6 +96,6 @@ examples:
>> interrupts = <43 2>;
>> interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
>> clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> - i2c-scl-clk-low-timeout-us = <10000>;
>> + i2c-transfer-timeout-us = <10000>;
> Chris, can you please give it an ack?
>
> The whole series is coherent to this change.
Looks like you weren't on the To: list for the cover letter which I
replied to.
For the series
Reviewed-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
and on a P2041RDB
Tested-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists