linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/svm/pmu: Set PerfMonV2 global control bits correctly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZeYpwY5XayggqtlL@google.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 20:06:25 +0000
From: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>, seanjc@...gle.com,
	pbonzini@...hat.com, dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com,
	jmattson@...gle.com, ravi.bangoria@....com, nikunj.dadhania@....com,
	santosh.shukla@....com, manali.shukla@....com, babu.moger@....com,
	kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/svm/pmu: Set PerfMonV2 global control bits
 correctly

On Fri, Mar 01, 2024, Like Xu wrote:
> On 1/3/2024 3:50 pm, Sandipan Das wrote:
> > With PerfMonV2, a performance monitoring counter will start operating
> > only when both the PERF_CTLx enable bit as well as the corresponding
> > PerfCntrGlobalCtl enable bit are set.
> > 
> > When the PerfMonV2 CPUID feature bit (leaf 0x80000022 EAX bit 0) is set
> > for a guest but the guest kernel does not support PerfMonV2 (such as
> > kernels older than v5.19), the guest counters do not count since the
> > PerfCntrGlobalCtl MSR is initialized to zero and the guest kernel never
> > writes to it.
> 
> If the vcpu has the PerfMonV2 feature, it should not work the way legacy
> PMU does. Users need to use the new driver to operate the new hardware,
> don't they ? One practical approach is that the hypervisor should not set
> the PerfMonV2 bit for this unpatched 'v5.19' guest.
> 
How could hypervisor know the guest 'Linux version'? KVM should not even
assume it is Linux. So that means, if the 'guest driver' does not
support PerfMonV2, then guest should just continue to use its legacy code.
Otherwise, the guest is considered broken.

Thanks.
-Mingwei
> > 
> > This is not observed on bare-metal as the default value of the
> > PerfCntrGlobalCtl MSR after a reset is 0x3f (assuming there are six
> > counters) and the counters can still be operated by using the enable
> > bit in the PERF_CTLx MSRs. Replicate the same behaviour in guests for
> > compatibility with older kernels.
> > 
> > Before:
> > 
> >    $ perf stat -e cycles:u true
> > 
> >     Performance counter stats for 'true':
> > 
> >                     0      cycles:u
> > 
> >           0.001074773 seconds time elapsed
> > 
> >           0.001169000 seconds user
> >           0.000000000 seconds sys
> > 
> > After:
> > 
> >    $ perf stat -e cycles:u true
> > 
> >     Performance counter stats for 'true':
> > 
> >               227,850      cycles:u
> > 
> >           0.037770758 seconds time elapsed
> > 
> >           0.000000000 seconds user
> >           0.037886000 seconds sys
> > 
> > Reported-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> > Fixes: 4a2771895ca6 ("KVM: x86/svm/pmu: Add AMD PerfMonV2 support")
> > Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
> > ---
> >   arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> > index b6a7ad4d6914..14709c564d6a 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> > @@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ static void amd_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >   	if (pmu->version > 1) {
> >   		pmu->global_ctrl_mask = ~((1ull << pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters) - 1);
> >   		pmu->global_status_mask = pmu->global_ctrl_mask;
> > +		pmu->global_ctrl = ~pmu->global_ctrl_mask;
> >   	}
> >   	pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_GP] = ((u64)1 << 48) - 1;