lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon,  4 Mar 2024 17:46:16 -0500
From: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
To: niklas.cassel@....com
Cc: Frank.li@....com,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	jdmason@...zu.us,
	jingoohan1@...il.com,
	kw@...ux.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	lpieralisi@...nel.org,
	mani@...nel.org,
	robh@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: dwc: Fix index 0 incorrectly being interpreted as a free ATU slot

dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu()
{
	...
	if (!ep->bar_to_atu[bar])
		free_win = find_first_zero_bit(ep->ib_window_map, pci->num_ib_windows);
	else
		free_win = ep->bar_to_atu[bar];
	...
}

The atu index 0 is valid case for atu number. The find_first_zero_bit()
will return 6 when second time call into this function if atu is 0. Suppose
it should use branch 'free_win = ep->bar_to_atu[bar]'.

Change 'bar_to_atu' to free_win + 1. Initialize bar_to_atu as 0 to indicate
it have not allocate atu to the bar.

Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@....com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/ZXt2A+Fusfz3luQV@x1-carbon/T/#u
Fixes: 4284c88fff0e ("PCI: designware-ep: Allow pci_epc_set_bar() update inbound map address")
Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@....com>
Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
---

Notes:
    Change from v1 to v2
    - update subject
    - use free_win + 1 solution
    - still leave MAX_IATU_IN as 256. I am not sure if there are platfrom have
    256 ATU. Suppose it only use max 6 in current EP framework.
    - @Niklas, can you help test it. My platform become unstable today.

 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
index 5befed2dc02b7..ba932bafdb230 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
 	if (!ep->bar_to_atu[bar])
 		free_win = find_first_zero_bit(ep->ib_window_map, pci->num_ib_windows);
 	else
-		free_win = ep->bar_to_atu[bar];
+		free_win = ep->bar_to_atu[bar] - 1;
 
 	if (free_win >= pci->num_ib_windows) {
 		dev_err(pci->dev, "No free inbound window\n");
@@ -153,7 +153,11 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = free_win;
+	/*
+	 * Always increment free_win before assignment, since value 0 is used to identify
+	 * unallocated mapping.
+	 */
+	ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = free_win + 1;
 	set_bit(free_win, ep->ib_window_map);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -190,7 +194,10 @@ static void dw_pcie_ep_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
 	struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
 	enum pci_barno bar = epf_bar->barno;
-	u32 atu_index = ep->bar_to_atu[bar];
+	u32 atu_index = ep->bar_to_atu[bar] - 1;
+
+	if (!ep->bar_to_atu[bar])
+		return;
 
 	__dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, func_no, bar, epf_bar->flags);
 
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ