linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] scmi-cpufreq: Set transition_delay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240304070058.kfqg3ypssn5x6k7s@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:30:58 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
	Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>,
	Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]  scmi-cpufreq: Set transition_delay_us

On 22-02-24, 14:56, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> policy's fields definitions:
> `transition_delay_us`:
> The minimum amount of time between two consecutive freq. requests
> for one policy.
> `transition_latency`:
> Delta between freq. change request and effective freq. change on
> the hardware.
> 
> cpufreq_policy_transition_delay_us() uses the `transition_delay_us`
> value if available. Otherwise a value is induced from the policy's
> `transition_latency`.
> 
> The scmi-cpufreq driver doesn't populate the `transition_delay_us`.
> Values matching the definition are available through the SCMI
> specification.
> Add support to fetch these values and use them in the scmi-cpufreq
> driver.

How do we merge this series ? I can only pick the last commit.

-- 
viresh