linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] cpufreq: scmi: Add boost frequency support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:52:11 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: sudeep.holla@....com, Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
Cc: cristian.marussi@....com, rafael@...nel.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
	dietmar.eggemann@....com, lukasz.luba@....com, sboyd@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, nm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] cpufreq: scmi: Add boost frequency support

On 04-03-24, 12:39, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-02-24, 23:04, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > This series adds provision to mark dynamic opps as boost capable and adds
> > boost frequency support to the scmi cpufreq driver.
> > 
> > V2:
> > * Document boost flag. [Lukasz]
> > * Remove sustained_freq check. [Pierre]
> > * simplify sustained_freq_khz calculation. [Sudeep]
> > * fix default per-policy state. [Dietmar]
> > * fix typo in commit message in patch 3.
> > 
> > Depends on:
> > per-policy boost: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/cover/20240227165309.620422-1-quic_sibis@quicinc.com/
> 
> It doesn't really depend on it, just that there is a bug that needs to
> be fixed.
> 
> > Sibi Sankar (3):
> >   OPP: Extend dev_pm_opp_data with turbo support
> >   firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for marking certain frequencies as
> >     boost
> >   cpufreq: scmi: Enable boost support
> 
> Sudeep,
> 
> Can I apply this series ?

I have gone ahead and applied [1,3]/3.

-- 
viresh