[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f61c6f4-f058-46bc-a7b1-ce4a397a06dd@de.bosch.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:22:17 +0100
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>
To: Valentin Obst <kernel@...entinobst.de>, <laura.nao@...labora.com>
CC: <a.hindborg@...sung.com>, <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
<benno.lossin@...ton.me>, <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
<gary@...yguo.net>, <kernel@...labora.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <ojeda@...nel.org>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <sergio.collado@...il.com>,
<shuah@...nel.org>, <usama.anjum@...labora.com>, <wedsonaf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] kselftest: Add basic test for probing the rust sample
modules
On 03.03.2024 15:48, Valentin Obst wrote:
> Perhaps we can also add a section about these tests to the new
> `Documentation/rust/testing.rst` [1]. We could mention that they exist,
> how to run them, and link to the kselftest documentation for further
> information.
>
> Not necessary to resend, perhaps we can do that in a separate patch when
> this patch and the one by Dirk are merged.
Yes, that sounds good :)
Laura: If you like to write some basic intro as proposed by Valentin
please do it against
https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/rust-next/Documentation/rust/testing.rst
in a separate patch.
Best regards
Dirk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists