linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWi069YAvOoXe7sHJ_o702tY4tDQgL3sfApPR3aCnZboQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:12:38 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Nikolai Kondrashov <spbnick@...il.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
	Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>, linuxtv-ci@...uxtv.org, 
	dave.pigott@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	gustavo.padovan@...labora.com, pawiecz@...labora.com, 
	tales.aparecida@...il.com, workflows@...r.kernel.org, 
	kernelci@...ts.linux.dev, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, 
	kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, nfraprado@...labora.com, davidgow@...gle.com, 
	cocci@...ia.fr, Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr, laura.nao@...labora.com, 
	ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com, kernel@...labora.com, 
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 10:30 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 3:30 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On 3/2/24 14:10, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > While checkpatch is indeed of arguable value, I think it would help a
> > > lot not having to bother about the persistent _build_ failures on
> > > 32-bit systems. You mentioned the fancy drm CI system above, but they
> > > don't run tests and not even test builds on 32-bit targets, which has
> > > repeatedly caused (and currently does cause) build failures in drm
> > > code when trying to build, say, arm:allmodconfig in linux-next. Most
> > > trivial build failures in linux-next (and, yes, sometimes mainline)
> > > could be prevented with a simple generic CI.
> >
> > Yes, definitely. Thanks for bringing that up.
>
> +1

> Kisskb can send out email when builds get broken, and when they get
> fixed again.  I receive such emails for the m68k builds.

Like this (yes, one more in DRM; sometimes I wonder if DRM is meant only
for 64-bit little-endian platforms with +200 GiB/s memory bandwidth):

---8<-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: kisskb: FAILED linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc8 Mon Mar 04, 06:35
To: geert@...ux-m68k.org
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 08:05:14 -0000

FAILED linux-next/m68k-allmodconfig/m68k-gcc8 Mon Mar 04, 06:35

http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/15135537/

Commit:   Add linux-next specific files for 20240304
          67908bf6954b7635d33760ff6dfc189fc26ccc89
Compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 / GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.36.1

Possible errors
---------------

ERROR: modpost: "__udivdi3" [drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i-drm-hdmi.ko] undefined!
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modpost:145: Module.symvers] Error 1
make[2]: *** [Makefile:1871: modpost] Error 2
make[1]: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Error 2

No warnings found in log.
------------------------------------------------------------------->8---

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68korg

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds