linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: add Canaan K230 boards compatible strings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tencent_BF607C338244DA7F8EB2B8F2314A218B8D08@qq.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 16:51:05 +0800
From: Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: add Canaan K230 boards compatible
 strings

On 2024/3/4 16:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/03/2024 14:26, Yangyu Chen wrote:
>> Since K230 was released, K210 is no longer the only SoC in the Kendryte
>> series, so remove the K210 string from the description. Also, add two
>> boards based on k230 to compatible strings to allow them to be used in the
>> dt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/canaan.yaml | 13 ++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/canaan.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/canaan.yaml
>> index 41fd11f70a49..444758db964e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/canaan.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/canaan.yaml
>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ maintainers:
>>     - Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
>>   
>>   description:
>> -  Canaan Kendryte K210 SoC-based boards
>> +  Canaan Kendryte SoC-based boards
>>   
>>   properties:
>>     $nodename:
>> @@ -42,6 +42,17 @@ properties:
>>         - items:
>>             - const: canaan,kendryte-k210
>>   
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: canaan,k230-usip-lp3-evb
>> +          - const: canaan,kendryte-k230
>> +
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: canaan,canmv-k230
> 
> Why this is not part of previous entry in an enum?
> 
>> +          - const: canaan,kendryte-k230
>> +
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: canaan,kendryte-k230
> 
> Usually you cannot run SoCs alone. What does it represent (in real life)?
> 

I'm not sure what it means.

If you wonder why should I add a compatible string for soc, that is 
although we cannot run SoCs alone, adding a soc compatible will allow 
some bootloaders or SBI on RISC-V to choose an errata for a soc. Such as 
this opensbi patch. [1]

If you wonder why I should allow a soc-compatible string with soc alone, 
that is because k210 did it previously. And provide a k210_generic.dts 
to use it. I haven't provided generic dts now but allowing only 
soc-compatible string alone would also be acceptable I think.

[1] 
https://github.com/cyyself/opensbi/commit/b113c1c01d700314a4a696297ec09031a9399354

Thanks,
Yangyu Chen

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>