lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZeWTsTcK+3uvKeju@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 10:26:09 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] sched/balancing: Change 'enum cpu_idle_type' to have
 more natural definitions


* Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> I think its all getting accounted. Just that its not being printed. With 
> the below change, able to see all the three types, albeit not in right 
> order as per schedstat documentation.
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/stats.c b/kernel/sched/stats.c
> index 857f837f52cb..f36b54bdd9fa 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/stats.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/stats.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static int show_schedstat(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>  
>                         seq_printf(seq, "domain%d %*pb", dcount++,
>                                    cpumask_pr_args(sched_domain_span(sd)));
> -                       for (itype = CPU_IDLE; itype < CPU_MAX_IDLE_TYPES;
> +                       for (itype = 0; itype < CPU_MAX_IDLE_TYPES;
>                                         itype++) {
>                                 seq_printf(seq, " %u %u %u %u %u %u %u %u",
>                                     sd->lb_count[itype],

Indeed, good catch - there was an implicit reliance on CPU_IDLE's position 
in the loop above that my patch didn't take into account.

Fixed.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ