linux-kernel - Re: [tip:timers/core] [timers] 7ee9887703: netperf.Throughput

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:28:33 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
	lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, ying.huang@...el.com,
	feng.tang@...el.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/core] [timers]  7ee9887703:  netperf.Throughput_Mbps
 -1.2% regression

Le Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:13:00AM +0800, Oliver Sang a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 01:32:45AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Le Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 04:09:24PM +0800, kernel test robot a écrit :
> > > commit: 
> > >   57e95a5c41 ("timers: Introduce function to check timer base is_idle flag")
> > >   7ee9887703 ("timers: Implement the hierarchical pull model")
> > 
> > Is this something that is observed also with the commits that follow in this
> > branch?
> 
> when this bisect done, we also tested the tip of timers/core branch at that time
> 8b3843ae3634b vdso/datapage: Quick fix - use asm/page-def.h for ARM64
> 
> the regression still exists on it:
> 
> 57e95a5c4117dc6a 7ee988770326fca440472200c3e 8b3843ae3634b472530fb69c386
> ---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
>          %stddev     %change         %stddev     %change         %stddev
>              \          |                \          |                \
>       4.10            -1.2%       4.05            -1.2%       4.05        netperf.ThroughputBoth_Mbps
>       1049            -1.2%       1037            -1.2%       1036        netperf.ThroughputBoth_total_Mbps
>       4.10            -1.2%       4.05            -1.2%       4.05        netperf.Throughput_Mbps
>       1049            -1.2%       1037            -1.2%       1036        netperf.Throughput_total_Mbps

Oh, I see... :-/

> > Ie: would it be possible to compare instead:
> > 
> >     57e95a5c4117 (timers: Introduce function to check timer base is_idle flag)
> > VS
> >     b2cf7507e186 (timers: Always queue timers on the local CPU)
> > 
> > Because the improvements introduced by 7ee9887703 are mostly relevant after
> > b2cf7507e186.
> 
> got it. will test.
> 
> at the same time, we noticed current tip of timers/core is
> a184d9835a0a6 (tip/timers/core) tick/sched: Fix build failure for
> CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON=n

Shouldn't be a problem as it fixes an issue introduced after:

	  b2cf7507e186 (timers: Always queue timers on the local CPU)

> 
> though it seems irelevant, we will still get data for it.

Thanks a lot, this will be very helpful. Especially with all the perf diff
details like in the initial email report. Because I'm having some troubles
running those lkp tests. How is it working BTW? I've seen it downloading
two kernel trees but I haven't noticed a kernel build. Are the two compared
instances running through kvm?

Thanks.

> 
> > 
> > Thanks.