lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoAM-xnf2d+btrW3cjz49T1fhcg3XJQPc9S2PUaUuJJ3cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:19:52 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Sam Sun <samsun1006219@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, j.vosburgh@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, 
	davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	syzkaller@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Kernel bug] KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in in4_pton

Hi Sam,

On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 11:23 PM Sam Sun <samsun1006219@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 4:18 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 3:41 AM Sam Sun <samsun1006219@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear developers and maintainers,
> > >
> > > We found a bug through our modified Syzkaller. Kernel version is b401b621758,
> > > Linux 6.8-rc5. The C reproducer and kernel config are attached.
> > >
> > > KASAN report is listed below
> > >
> > > ```
> > > ==================================================================
> > > BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in strlen+0x7d/0xa0 lib/string.c:418
> > > Read of size 1 at addr ffff8881119c4781 by task syz-executor665/8107
> > >
> > > CPU: 1 PID: 8107 Comm: syz-executor665 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc7 #1
> > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
> > > Call Trace:
> > >  <TASK>
> > >  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> > >  dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:106
> > >  print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:364 [inline]
> > >  print_report+0xc1/0x5e0 mm/kasan/report.c:475
> > >  kasan_report+0xbe/0xf0 mm/kasan/report.c:588
> > >  strlen+0x7d/0xa0 lib/string.c:418
> > >  __fortify_strlen include/linux/fortify-string.h:210 [inline]
> > >  in4_pton+0xa3/0x3f0 net/core/utils.c:130
> > >  bond_option_arp_ip_targets_set+0xc2/0x910 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:1201
> > >  __bond_opt_set+0x2a4/0x1030 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:767
> > >  __bond_opt_set_notify+0x48/0x150 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:792
> > >  bond_opt_tryset_rtnl+0xda/0x160 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c:817
> > >  bonding_sysfs_store_option+0xa1/0x120 drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfsc:156
> > >  dev_attr_store+0x54/0x80 drivers/base/core.c:2366
> > >  sysfs_kf_write+0x114/0x170 fs/sysfs/file.c:136
> > >  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x337/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:334
> > >  call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2020 [inline]
> > >  new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]
> > >  vfs_write+0x96a/0xd80 fs/read_write.c:584
> > >  ksys_write+0x122/0x250 fs/read_write.c:637
> > >  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> > >  do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> > >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
> > > RIP: 0033:0x7f797835cfcd
> > > Code: 28 c3 e8 46 1e 00 00 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> > > RSP: 002b:00007ffff464ffb8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffff46501b8 RCX: 00007f797835cfcd
> > > RDX: 00000000000000f5 RSI: 0000000020000140 RDI: 0000000000000003
> > > RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffff46501b8
> > > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
> > > R13: 00007ffff46501a8 R14: 00007f79783da530 R15: 0000000000000001
> > >  </TASK>
> > >
> > > All
> >
> >
> > >
> > > We analyzed the cause of this bug. In the function "bond_option_arp_ip_targets_set" in
> > > drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c, newval->string can be controlled by users. If string
> > >
> > > is empty, newval->string+1 points to the address after newval->string, causing potential
> > >
> > > info leak.
> > >
> > > One possible fix is to check before calling in4_pton, whether strnlen(newval->string) > 1.
> > >
> > > If you have any questions or require more information, please feel
> > > free to contact us.
> > >
> > > Reported by Yue Sun <samsun1006219@...il.com>
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the report and analysis.
> >
> > Are you willing to provide a patch ?
> >
> > You would get more credits than a "Reported-by:" tag :)
> >
> > Thanks
>
> Dear Eric,
>
> Thanks for letting me provide a patch! One possible patch
> is listed below.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
> b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
> index f3f27f0bd2a6..a6d01055f455 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
> @@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ static int bond_option_arp_ip_targets_set(struct
> bonding *bond,
>      __be32 target;
>
>      if (newval->string) {
> -        if (!in4_pton(newval->string+1, -1, (u8 *)&target, -1, NULL)) {
> +        if (!strlen(newval->string) || !in4_pton(newval->string+1,
> -1, (u8 *)&target, -1, NULL)) {
>              netdev_err(bond->dev, "invalid ARP target %pI4 specified\n",
>                     &target);
>              return ret;

You could submit the patch targetting at the latest net tree on your
own instead of replying to this thread. And then people will review it
soon :)

Thanks,
Jason

>
> This patch was tested on kernel commit b401b621758,
> tag Linux 6.8-rc5 against the C repro listed in previous
> email.
>
> If you have any questions, please contact us.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yue
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ