[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a89fafb-f62e-472f-b40b-8bf97954e9e3@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 20:00:43 +0800
From: Bitao Hu <yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: liusong@...ux.alibaba.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, pmladek@...e.com,
kernelfans@...il.com, deller@....de, npiggin@...il.com,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
jan.kiszka@...mens.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 2/4] genirq: Provide a snapshot mechanism for interrupt
statistics
Hi,
On 2024/3/2 03:22, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Doug!
>
> On Wed, Feb 28 2024 at 14:44, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> I won't insist on it, but I continue to worry about memory
>> implications with large numbers of CPUs. With a 4-byte int, 8192 max
>> CPUs, and 100 IRQs the extra "ref" value takes up over 3MB of memory
>> (8192 * 4 bytes * 100).
>>
>> Technically, you could add a new symbol like "config
>> NEED_IRQ_SNAPSHOTS". This wouldn't be a symbol selectable by the end
>> user but would automatically be selected by "config
>> SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM". If the config wasn't defined then the
>> struct wouldn't contain "ref" and the snapshot routines would just be
>> static inline stubs.
>>
>> Maybe Thomas has an opinion about whether this is something to worry
>> about. Worst case it wouldn't be hard to do in a follow-up patch.
>
> I'd say it makes sense to give people a choice to save memory especially
> when the softlock detector code is not enabled.
>
> It's rather straight forward to do.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ---
> --- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,9 @@ struct pt_regs;
> */
> struct irqstat {
> unsigned int cnt;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENIRQ_STAT_SNAPSHOT
> unsigned int ref;
> +#endif
> };
>
> /**
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
> @@ -978,6 +978,7 @@ static unsigned int kstat_irqs(unsigned
> return sum;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENIRQ_STAT_SNAPSHOT
> void kstat_snapshot_irqs(void)
> {
> struct irq_desc *desc;
> @@ -998,6 +999,7 @@ unsigned int kstat_get_irq_since_snapsho
> return 0;
> return this_cpu_read(desc->kstat_irqs->cnt) - this_cpu_read(desc->kstat_irqs->ref);
> }
> +#endif
>
> /**
> * kstat_irqs_usr - Get the statistics for an interrupt from thread context
> --- a/kernel/irq/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
> @@ -108,6 +108,10 @@ config GENERIC_IRQ_MATRIX_ALLOCATOR
> config GENERIC_IRQ_RESERVATION_MODE
> bool
>
> +# Snapshot for interrupt statistics
> +config GENERIC_IRQ_STAT_SNAPSHOT
> + bool
> +
> # Support forced irq threading
> config IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
> bool
I think we should follow Douglas's suggestion by making
"config GENERIC_IRQ_STAT_SNAPSHOT" automatically selectable by
"config SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM". This can prevent users
from inadvertently disabling "config GENERIC_IRQ_STAT_SNAPSHOT"
while enabling "config SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM".
Best Regards,
Bitao Hu
diff --git a/kernel/irq/Kconfig b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
index 2531f3496ab6..9cf3b2d4c2a8 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/irq/Kconfig
@@ -108,6 +108,15 @@ config GENERIC_IRQ_MATRIX_ALLOCATOR
config GENERIC_IRQ_RESERVATION_MODE
bool
+# Snapshot for interrupt statistics
+config GENERIC_IRQ_STAT_SNAPSHOT
+ bool
+ help
+
+ Say Y here to enable the kernel to provide a snapshot mechanism
+ for interrupt statistics.
+
+
# Support forced irq threading
config IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
bool
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 49f652674bd8..899b69fcb598 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1032,6 +1032,7 @@ config SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR
config SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM
bool "Detect Interrupt Storm in Soft Lockups"
depends on SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR && IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
+ select GENERIC_IRQ_STAT_SNAPSHOT
default y if NR_CPUS <= 128
help
Say Y here to enable the kernel to detect interrupt storm
Powered by blists - more mailing lists