[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZeXRWDGvd8P7KhxJ@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 21:49:12 +0800
From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>
Cc: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/1] fpga: add an owner and use it to take the
low-level module's refcount
> Just to be sure that I understood correctly, you want to split the
> changes into two patches, like:
>
> a) add module owner to the manager struct and take it in
> __fpga_mgr_get(); move put_device() from __fpga_mgr_get() to
> fpga_mgr_get() and of_fpga_mgr_get().
>
> b) add the mutex and the unregistered flag for protection against races.
>
> So that (b) can be reverted if try_module_get_safe() will be accepted?
Yes, that's what I mean.
>
> > [...]
>
> Thanks,
> Marco
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists