[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SN6PR02MB41574B4345AC47DCF1BD176AD4232@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:47:24 +0000
From: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>
CC: "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "petr@...arici.cz" <petr@...arici.cz>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Document min_align_mask assumption
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 4:06 AM
>
> iommu-dma does not explicitly reference min_align_mask since we already
> assume that that will be less than or equal to any typical IOVA granule.
> We wouldn't realistically expect to see the case where it is larger, and
> that would be non-trivial to support, however for the sake of reasoning
> (particularly around the interaction with SWIOTLB), let's clearly
> enforce the assumption.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 50ccc4f1ef81..b58f5a3311c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -859,6 +859,11 @@ static dma_addr_t __iommu_dma_map(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys,
> iommu_deferred_attach(dev, domain))
> return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
>
> + /* If anyone ever wants this we'd need support in the IOVA allocator */
> + if (dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) > iova_mask(iovad),
> + "Unsupported alignment constraint\n"))
> + return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
> +
> size = iova_align(iovad, size + iova_off);
>
> iova = iommu_dma_alloc_iova(domain, size, dma_mask, dev);
> --
> 2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists