linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/rtc: Remove unused intel-mid.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0c7c00c0-3b4a-41b3-8664-9ea6ee7e0814@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 08:34:59 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>,
 Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/rtc: Remove unused intel-mid.h

On 3/5/24 08:31, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Any chance you'd like to look a _bit_ more widely and just clean up all
>> of the unnecessary intel-mid.h #includes that are scattered around?
> All relative patches just have been sent. They are independent, hence sent
> separately. Please, apply, what you can, if there is no objection.

Ahh, thanks for the context.  Any chance you could share that up front
next time? ;)

I'll stick this in the x86 queue.