linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Drop i2c-mux.yaml reference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 12:06:05 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mux: i2c-demux-pinctrl: Drop
 i2c-mux.yaml reference

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 4:48 AM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 09:50:13PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 01:05:50PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > The I2C de-mux is different than an I2C mux, so i2c-mux.yaml is not
> > > relevant and shouldn't be referenced.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
>
> Andi, can you pick these up?

I already did since you gave your reviewed-by and they hadn't
otherwise been picked up.

> Or you negotiate with Rob how you want to handle I2C DT patches. I
> agreed with him that I usually take them. Except for generic cleanups or
> so.

Yes, that is my preference. And how most subsystems work for bindings.

Rob