[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+wdu20iU5c-j6-V61nm6zuBOfDDqGdunjaGQLbc9BRmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 12:53:21 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, David Wronek <davidwronek@...il.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add SC7180 compatible string
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:11 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 4:30 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 00:22, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 05:57:42PM +0100, David Wronek wrote:
> > > > Document the compatible for the UFS found on SC7180.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Wronek <davidwronek@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > Should have been picked up by SCSI/UFS maintainers, but it
> > > hasn't, so I applied it.
> >
> > And it now triggers schema warnings, because sc7180-ufshc has 7 clocks
> > and 1 reg entries.
>
> And now dropped... Perhaps the dts changes should be too.
>
> Maybe QCom maintainers should require a report of dtbs_check on new
> boards. My comparisons of Linus vs. next warnings often show an
> increase in QCom warnings. Like right now:
>
> linus: arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom:1990:265
> next: arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom:1610:298
Still a bunch of warnings in next. This binding should be resubmitted
with fixes or the dts changes dropped.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists