lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467b8479-dfd8-43a4-92eb-d19dc65989cd@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:59:20 -0800
From: Oreoluwa Babatunde <quic_obabatun@...cinc.com>
To: <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, <jonas@...thpole.se>,
        <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>, <shorne@...il.com>,
        <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, <dalias@...c.org>,
        <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <frowand.list@...il.com>
CC: <linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org>, <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Restructure init sequence to set aside reserved
 memory earlier


On 2/9/2024 4:29 PM, Oreoluwa Babatunde wrote:
> The loongarch, openric, and sh architectures allocate memory from
> memblock before it gets the chance to set aside reserved memory regions.
> This means that there is a possibility for memblock to allocate from
> memory regions that are supposed to be reserved.
>
> This series makes changes to the arch specific setup code to call the
> functions responsible for setting aside the reserved memory regions earlier
> in the init sequence.
> Hence, by the time memblock starts being used to allocate memory, the
> reserved memory regions should already be set aside, and it will no
> longer be possible for allocations to come from them.
>
> I am currnetly using an arm64 device, and so I will need assistance from
> the relevant arch maintainers to help check if this breaks anything from
> compilation to device bootup.
>
> Oreoluwa Babatunde (3):
>   loongarch: Call arch_mem_init() before platform_init() in the init
>     sequence
>   openrisc: Call setup_memory() earlier in the init sequence
>   sh: Call paging_init() earlier in the init sequence
>
>  arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
>  arch/openrisc/kernel/setup.c  | 6 +++---
>  arch/sh/kernel/setup.c        | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Hello,

Loongarch patch has already merged for this, but review is still pending
from openrisc and sh architectures.
Could someone please comment on these?

Regards,

Oreoluwa

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ