[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e1b554b-a675-14d2-59aa-7f37e3dd5994@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:56:22 +0800
From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
To: yangxingui <yangxingui@...wei.com>, John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
<jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
<chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>, <kangfenglong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: libsas: Fix disk not being scanned in after being
removed
On 2024/3/4 20:50, yangxingui wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 2024/3/1 9:55, Jason Yan wrote:
>> On 2024/2/29 2:13, John Garry wrote:
>>> On 21/02/2024 07:31, Xingui Yang wrote:
>>>> As of commit d8649fc1c5e4 ("scsi: libsas: Do discovery on empty PHY to
>>>> update PHY info"), do discovery will send a new SMP_DISCOVER and update
>>>> phy->phy_change_count. We found that if the disk is reconnected and phy
>>>> change_count changes at this time, the disk scanning process will
>>>> not be
>>>> triggered.
>>>>
>>>> So update the PHY info with the last query results.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: d8649fc1c5e4 ("scsi: libsas: Do discovery on empty PHY to
>>>> update PHY info")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@...wei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 9 ++++-----
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>>>> b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>>>> index a2204674b680..9563f5589948 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>>>> @@ -1681,6 +1681,10 @@ int sas_get_phy_attached_dev(struct
>>>> domain_device *dev, int phy_id,
>>>> if (*type == 0)
>>>> memset(sas_addr, 0, SAS_ADDR_SIZE);
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> + if ((SAS_ADDR(sas_addr) == 0) || (res == -ECOMM))
>>>
>>> It's odd to call sas_set_ex_phy() if we got res == -ECOMM. I mean, in
>>> this this case disc_resp is not filled in as the command did not
>>> execute, right? I know that is what the current code does, but it is
>>> strange.
>>
>> The current code actually re-send the SMP command and update the PHY
>> status only when the the SMP command is responded correctly.
>>
>> Xinggui, can you please fix this and send v3?
> The current location cannot directly update the phy information. The
> previous phy information will be used later, and the previous sas
> address will be compared with the currently queried sas address. At
> present, v2 is more suitable after many days of testing.
OK, so let me have a closer look at v2.
Thanks,
Jason
>
> Thanks,
> Xingui
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists