linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] auxdisplay: Add 7-segment LED display driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <216eb75d-5384-4654-9e86-4a9856494ad0@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 22:34:08 +0000
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven
	<geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "andrew@...n.ch"
	<andrew@...n.ch>, "gregory.clement@...tlin.com"
	<gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, "sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com"
	<sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>, "lee@...nel.org" <lee@...nel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] auxdisplay: Add 7-segment LED display driver


On 6/03/24 03:57, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 09:23:07AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 4:59 AM Chris Packham
>> <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
> ...
>
>>> +       priv->segment_gpios = devm_gpiod_get_array(dev, "segment", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>>> +       if (IS_ERR(priv->segment_gpios))
>>> +               return PTR_ERR(priv->segment_gpios);
>> This needs some validation of priv->segment_gpios->ndescs, else the
>> call to gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep() in seg_led_update() may
>> trigger an out-of-bounds access of the values bitmap.
> Alternatively we can call gpiod_count() beforehand and check its result.
Unless there are any objections I think I'll go with the ndescs check as 
it'll be easier to update to the subnode style in the future. It does 
mean there will be some extra allocations/frees (handled via the devm_ 
APIs) in the error case.