lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 02:06:20 +0100
From: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@...il.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, 
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, 
	shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, 
	pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, 
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, 
	conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, damon@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/143] 6.6.21-rc1 review

Den mån 4 mars 2024 kl 23:49 skrev SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon,  4 Mar 2024 21:22:00 +0000 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.21 release.
> > There are 143 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.21-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
> Attaching the test results summary below.  Please note that I retrieved the
> kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
>
> Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
>
> [1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
> [2] 5f9255b6ac45 ("Linux 6.6.21-rc1")
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> [...]
>
> ---
>
> ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
> ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
> ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
> ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
> ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
> ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
> ok 7 selftests: damon: debugfs_rm_non_contexts.sh
> ok 8 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
> ok 9 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_removed_scheme_dir.sh
> ok 10 selftests: damon: reclaim.sh
> ok 11 selftests: damon: lru_sort.sh
> ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
> ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
> ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
> ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
> ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
> ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
> ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
> ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
> ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
> ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
> ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
> ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
> ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
> ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
> ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
>  [33m
>  [92mPASS [39m
>

Works fine on my Arch Linux server with Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6400 CPU @ 2.70GHz
after the Arch Linux manual intervention for new mkinitcpio settings
and version in Arch

Tested by: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@...il.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ