linux-kernel - Lenovo ThinkPad X13s regerssions (was Re: Linux regressions report for mainline [2024-02-25])

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <83c6019f-9c6f-4ad1-87d5-e4f1bdaca93c@leemhuis.info>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:33:39 +0100
From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
 <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Lenovo ThinkPad X13s regerssions (was Re: Linux regressions report
 for mainline [2024-02-25])

[dropping Linus from CC, we can add him back later when needed]

On 27.02.24 11:20, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 01:21:46PM +0000, Regzbot (on behalf of Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> 
>> Johan Hovold also deals with multiple issues affecting Lenovo ThinkPad
>> X13s, but he send out patch series to fix some or all of those[1], so
>> with a bit of luck those issues will soon be fixed as well.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZctVmLK4zTwcpW3A@hovoldconsulting.com/

As 6.8 final might be just five days away, could you please help me out
with a short status update wrt. unresolved regressions from your side if
you have a minute? It's easy to get lost in all those issues. :-/ :-D

>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240217150228.5788-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org/
> 
> This series addresses a use-after-free in the PMIC glink driver caused
> by DRM bridge changes in rc1 and which can result in the internal
> display not showing up on boot.
> 
> The DRM/SoC fixes here have now been merged to drm-misc for 6.8.

What about the others from that series? Can they wait till 6.9? Or are
they on track for 6.8?

> [...]

> But also with these fixes, there are still a couple of regressions
> related to the Qualcomm DRM runtime PM rework in 6.8-rc1. I'll send
> separate reports to track those.

Any decision yet if they are going to be reverted for now?

Am I right assuming those would fix
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zd3kvD02Qvsh2Sid@hovoldconsulting.com/
which did not get even a single reply?

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.