linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/42] 5.10.212-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYsFuQDfvRGyUhLNuFXQc0yfu_eE3pnRYbUD7p9U7GEa9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 15:53:42 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/42] 5.10.212-rc1 review

On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 03:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.212 release.
> There are 42 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 06 Mar 2024 21:15:26 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.212-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Following build failures noticed on riscv.

The riscv defconfig, tinyconfig and allnoconfig builds on 5.10.
The riscv tinyconfig and allnoconfig builds on 5.15.

linux.5.10.y build failures on riscv.
riscv:

  * gcc-8-defconfig
  * clang-17-allnoconfig
  * gcc-12-tinyconfig
  * gcc-8-allnoconfig
  * gcc-8-allmodconfig
  * clang-17-defconfig
  * gcc-12-defconfig
  * clang-17-tinyconfig
  * gcc-12-allmodconfig
  * gcc-8-tinyconfig
  * gcc-12-allnoconfig

linux.5.15.y build failures on riscv.
riscv:
  build:
    * gcc-12-tinyconfig
    * gcc-8-allnoconfig
    * clang-17-tinyconfig
    * gcc-8-tinyconfig
    * gcc-12-allnoconfig

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c:39:9: error: implicit declaration
of function 'arch_stack_walk' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   39 |         arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL);
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

Suspecting patch,

riscv: add CALLER_ADDRx support
commit 680341382da56bd192ebfa4e58eaf4fec2e5bca7 upstream.

steps to reproduce:
---
# tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch riscv --toolchain gcc-12
--kconfig defconfig


Links:
 - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/v5.10.210-166-g4b0abedc88b0/testrun/22941782/suite/test/gcc-12-defconfig/details/
 - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/v5.10.210-166-g4b0abedc88b0/testrun/22941144/suite/test/gcc-12-defconfig/history/
 - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2dF5ke88GqtfanduGie1JGLUbVa/

 - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/v5.15.149-332-ge7cbbec10c6e/testrun/22942335/suite/test/gcc-12-allnoconfig/history/
 - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2dF68wn0dXbU2xGLRyzsxGdXTyB/


--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org