[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240304191804.0c48e532@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 19:18:04 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Remove precision vsnprintf() check from print
event
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 18:55:00 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 18:23:41 -0500
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
>
> > It appears to currently be limited by
> >
> > #define TRACE_SEQ_BUFFER_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE * 2 - \
> > (sizeof(struct seq_buf) + sizeof(size_t) + sizeof(int)))
> >
> > checked within tracing_mark_write().
>
> Yeah, I can hard code this to 8K as it handles output of complete events,
> that can dump a lot of data, and then limit the trace_marker writes to be 4K.
Actually, the trace_marker writes is already limited by
TRACE_SEQ_BUFFER_SIZE, and by making this hard coded to 8K, it limits the
size of the trace_marker writes.
I may make the writes even smaller.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists