[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fb62749-8c66-47ae-9b8b-7e670ebf4841@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:29:11 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>, Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>,
Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: TJ Adams <tadamsjr@...gle.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes
for SATA devices
On 05/03/2024 00:50, Igor Pylypiv wrote:
>
> static inline void sas_ata_disabled_notice(void)
> @@ -123,6 +125,10 @@ static inline int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *p
> sas_ata_disabled_notice();
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {
> + .attrs = NULL,
> +};
I just noticed a build issue.
With CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATA not set, I get this for W=1 build:
In file included from drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas.h:29,
from drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v1_hw.c:7:
/include/scsi/sas_ata.h:129:37: error: ‘sas_ata_sdev_attr_group’
defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
129 | static const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {
I suppose that marking sas_ata_sdev_attr_group as __maybe_unused is ok,
but less than ideal. The linker should strip it out of files when unused.
I think that this is also ok:
#define sas_ata_sdev_attr_group (struct attribute_group) {}
The compiler here will create a empty structure and have
&sas_ata_sdev_attr_group point at it.
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists