[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240306162447.2a843a11@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 16:24:47 +0100
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Rob Herring
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, Saravana
Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>, Max Zhen
<max.zhen@....com>, Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@....com>, Stefano Stabellini
<stefano.stabellini@...inx.com>, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Steen Hegelund
<steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>, Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] driver core: Introduce
device_link_wait_removal()
Hi Rafael,
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 13:48:37 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 9:51 AM Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > The commit 80dd33cf72d1 ("drivers: base: Fix device link removal")
> > introduces a workqueue to release the consumer and supplier devices used
> > in the devlink.
> > In the job queued, devices are release and in turn, when all the
> > references to these devices are dropped, the release function of the
> > device itself is called.
> >
> > Nothing is present to provide some synchronisation with this workqueue
> > in order to ensure that all ongoing releasing operations are done and
> > so, some other operations can be started safely.
> >
> > For instance, in the following sequence:
> > 1) of_platform_depopulate()
> > 2) of_overlay_remove()
> >
> > During the step 1, devices are released and related devlinks are removed
> > (jobs pushed in the workqueue).
> > During the step 2, OF nodes are destroyed but, without any
> > synchronisation with devlink removal jobs, of_overlay_remove() can raise
> > warnings related to missing of_node_put():
> > ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2
> >
> > Indeed, the missing of_node_put() call is going to be done, too late,
> > from the workqueue job execution.
> >
> > Introduce device_link_wait_removal() to offer a way to synchronize
> > operations waiting for the end of devlink removals (i.e. end of
> > workqueue jobs).
> > Also, as a flushing operation is done on the workqueue, the workqueue
> > used is moved from a system-wide workqueue to a local one.
> >
> > Fixes: 80dd33cf72d1 ("drivers: base: Fix device link removal")
>
> No, it is not fixed by this patch.
Was explicitly asked by Saravana on v1 review:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/CAGETcx9uP86EHyKJNifBMd23oCsA+KpMa+e36wJEEnHDve+Avg@mail.gmail.com/
The commit 80dd33cf72d1 introduces the workqueue and so some asynchronous tasks
on removal.
This patch and the next one allows to re-sync execution waiting for jobs in
the workqueue when it is needed.
>
> In fact, the only possibly observable effect of this patch is the
> failure when the allocation of device_link_wq fails AFAICS.
>
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>
> So why?
Cc:stable is needed as this patch is a prerequisite of patch 2 (needed
to fix the asynchronous workqueue task issue).
Best regards,
Hervé
--
Hervé Codina, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists