[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZefLjLa1KAHE0Toa@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:49:00 +0800
From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
To: Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>
CC: <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
Ryan Afranji <afranji@...gle.com>, Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
"Isaku Yamahata" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, Sean Christopherson
<seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, "Peter Gonda" <pgonda@...gle.com>, Haibo Xu
<haibo1.xu@...el.com>, Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>, Vishal
Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>, Roger Wang <runanwang@...gle.com>, Vipin
Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>, <jmattson@...gle.com>, <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 24/29] KVM: selftests: Expose _vm_vaddr_alloc
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 12:46:39PM -0800, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
>
> vm_vaddr_alloc always allocates memory in memslot 0. This allows users
> of this function to choose which memslot to allocate virtual memory
> in.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji <afranji@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h | 3 +++
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h
> index efd7ae8abb20..5dbebf5cfd07 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h
> @@ -561,6 +561,9 @@ void vm_mem_region_delete(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t slot);
> struct kvm_vcpu *__vm_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpu_id);
> void vm_populate_vaddr_bitmap(struct kvm_vm *vm);
> vm_vaddr_t vm_vaddr_unused_gap(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t sz, vm_vaddr_t vaddr_min);
> +vm_vaddr_t ____vm_vaddr_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t sz,
> + vm_vaddr_t vaddr_min, vm_paddr_t paddr_min,
> + uint32_t data_memslot, bool encrypt);
> vm_vaddr_t vm_vaddr_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t sz, vm_vaddr_t vaddr_min);
> vm_vaddr_t __vm_vaddr_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t sz, vm_vaddr_t vaddr_min,
> enum kvm_mem_region_type type);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> index 28780fa1f0f2..d024abc5379c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> @@ -1410,9 +1410,9 @@ vm_vaddr_t vm_vaddr_unused_gap(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t sz,
> * a unique set of pages, with the minimum real allocation being at least
> * a page.
> */
> -static vm_vaddr_t ____vm_vaddr_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t sz,
> - vm_vaddr_t vaddr_min, vm_paddr_t paddr_min,
> - uint32_t data_memslot, bool encrypt)
> +vm_vaddr_t ____vm_vaddr_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t sz,
> + vm_vaddr_t vaddr_min, vm_paddr_t paddr_min,
> + uint32_t data_memslot, bool encrypt)
Is it better to expose a helper function with meaningful name?
It's annoying to count the number of "_" to figure out which version is
used, especially when there're "__", "____" versions :)
> {
> uint64_t pages = (sz >> vm->page_shift) + ((sz % vm->page_size) != 0);
>
> --
> 2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists