linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/3] Enable firmware-managed USB resources on Qcom targets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:30:02 +0530
From: Sriram Dash <quic_sriramd@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        <kishon@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
        <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_psodagud@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_nkela@...cinc.com>, <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        <quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Enable firmware-managed USB resources on Qcom targets

On 3/6/2024 12:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/03/2024 19:04, Sriram Dash wrote:
>> On 3/5/2024 10:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 05/03/2024 17:57, Sriram Dash wrote:
>>>> Some target systems allow multiple resources to be managed by firmware.
>>>
>>> Which? Why this is so vague...
>>>
>>
>> SA8775 will be using it as pilot. Will include the target name.
>>
>>>> On these targets, tasks related to clocks, regulators, resets, and
>>>> interconnects can be delegated to the firmware, while the remaining
>>>> responsibilities are handled by Linux.
>>>>
>>>> To support the management of partial resources in Linux and leave the rest
>>>> to firmware, multiple power domains are introduced. Each power domain can
>>>> manage one or more resources, depending on the specific use case.
>>>>
>>>> These power domains handle SCMI calls to the firmware, enabling the
>>>> activation and deactivation of firmware-managed resources.
>>>>
>>>> The driver is responsible for managing multiple power domains and
>>>> linking them to consumers as needed. Incase there is only single
>>>> power domain, it is considered to be a standard GDSC hooked on to
>>>> the qcom dt node which is read and assigned to device structure
>>>> (by genpd framework) before the driver probe even begins.
>>>
>>> This will break the ABI. Sorry, come with an ABI stable solution.
>>>
>>
>> The plan is to include multiple power-domains and fw-managed
>> property or similar in the device tree and fw-managed property
>> will be deciding if we need some resource management offloaded
>> to firmware. So, OS is always in control here. The decision
>> making will be done in the drivers. Also, there will be no
>> separate vendor hooks.
> 
> This does not answer ABI breakage. Also, I don't have a clue what are
> "vendor hooks".
> 

Apologies for the confusion, Krysztof.
The bindings will depict whether the compatible will use
clocks/ regulators, etc or not. Will take care in the
next version on top of the scmi based dt solution.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>