[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240306161438.GA28427@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 17:14:38 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
"josef@...icpanda.com" <josef@...icpanda.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"jack@...e.com" <jack@...e.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND 16/16] nvme-pci: use blk_rq_dma_map() for NVMe SGL
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 11:05:18AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Yes. And this whole proposal also seems clearly confused (not just
> > because of the gazillion reposts) but because it mixes up the case
> > where we can coalesce CPU regions into a single dma_addr_t range
> > (iommu and maybe in the future swiotlb) and one where we need a
>
> I had the broad expectation that the DMA API user would already be
> providing a place to store the dma_addr_t as it has to feed that into
> the HW. That memory should simply last up until we do dma unmap and
> the cases that need dma_addr_t during unmap can go get it from there.
Well. The dma_addr_t needs to be fed into the hardware somehow
obviously. But for a the coalesced case we only need one such
field, not Nranges.
> We can't do much on the map side as single range doesn't imply
> contiguous range, P2P and alignment create discontinuities in the
> dma_addr_t that still have to be delt with.
For alignment the right answer is almost always to require the
upper layers to align to the iommu granularity. We've been a bit
lax about that due to the way scatterlists are designed, but
requiring the proper alignment actually benefits everyone.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists