[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_BA1473492BC618B473864561EA3AB1418908@qq.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:55:34 +0800
From: linke li <lilinke99@...com>
To:
Cc: lilinke99@...com,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ring-buffer: mark racy accesses on work->wait_index
Mark data races to work->wait_index as benign using READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE. These accesses are expected to be racy.
Signed-off-by: linke li <lilinke99@...com>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 0699027b4f4c..a47e9e9750cc 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ void ring_buffer_wake_waiters(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
rbwork = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
}
- rbwork->wait_index++;
+ WRITE_ONCE(rbwork->wait_index, READ_ONCE(rbwork->wait_index) + 1);
/* make sure the waiters see the new index */
smp_wmb();
@@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, int full)
/* Make sure to see the new wait index */
smp_rmb();
- if (wait_index != work->wait_index)
+ if (wait_index != READ_ONCE(work->wait_index))
break;
}
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists