[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240306202537.GA587561-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 14:25:37 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,imx-asrc: update max
interrupt numbers
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 12:33:03PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> fsl,imx8qxp-spdif and fsl,imx8qm-spdif have 2 interrupts. Other platforms
> have 1 interrupt.
>
> Increase max interrupt number to 2 and add restriction for platforms except
> i.MX8QXP and i.MX8QM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml
> index 56f8c0c8afdea..7f6590708e1ec 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,spdif.yaml
> @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ properties:
> maxItems: 1
>
> interrupts:
> - maxItems: 1
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 2
>
> dmas:
> items:
> @@ -101,6 +102,21 @@ required:
> additionalProperties: false
>
> allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - fsl,imx8qm-spdif
> + - fsl,imx8qxp-spdif
> + then:
> + properties:
> + interrupts:
> + minItems: 2
Nowhere is it explained what the 2 interrupts are or what the order of
them is. Is the first interrupt the same as before, and there is a new
interrupt for something else? Or it's the same interrupts, but they've
just split up into 2?
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists