linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-sai: allow only one dma-names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240306205524.GB587561-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 14:55:24 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl-sai: allow only one
 dma-names

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 02:25:53PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 06:45:13PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 12:33:04PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > > Some sai only connect one direction dma (rx/tx) in SOC. For example:
> > > imx8qxp sai5 only connect tx dma channel. So allow only one "rx" or "tx"
> > > for dma-names.
> > > 
> > > Remove description under dmas because no user use index to get dma channel.
> > > All user use 'dma-names' to get correct dma channel. dma-names already in
> > > 'required' list.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml | 13 ++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > > index 2456d958adeef..6f551c68d33db 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,sai.yaml
> > > @@ -81,15 +81,14 @@ properties:
> > >  
> > >    dmas:
> > >      minItems: 1
> > > -    items:
> > > -      - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for RX
> > > -      - description: DMA controller phandle and request line for TX
> > > +    maxItems: 2
> > >  
> > >    dma-names:
> > > -    minItems: 1
> > > -    items:
> > > -      - const: rx
> > > -      - const: tx
> > > +    oneOf:
> > > +      - items:
> > > +          - const: rx
> > > +          - const: tx
> > > +      - enum: [ rx, tx ]
> > 
> > I'm not entirely sure if this was Rob's suggestion, I got the impression
> > he was suggesting that in the two items case we'd not care about the
> > order. But while I think this is different to that suggestion it's also
> > not wrong.
> 
> I log this at cover-letter. b4 can't support write change log at every
> patch yet.

It never will (probably). That's because it doesn't need to. You can 
just do it with git. When you edit the commit message, then after the 
tags, Add '---' and put whatever you want after. That works as long as 
the commit is applied from a patch as 'git am' will drop it. 

> Rob's suggest was not work. dt-binding check complain too long
> if there are two dma-names = "rx", "tx". 

So I'm wrong or you didn't have it correct? No way to tell with your 
explanation. Let me give you the exact schema:

dma-names:
  minItems: 1
  items:
    - enum: [ rx, tx ]
    - const: tx

This says we can have 1 or 2 entries. The first entry can be either rx 
or tx. The 2nd entry must be tx. That's what you want. However, '"tx", 
"tx"' is allowed with the above, but we enforce items to be unique 
elsewhere. Or I thought we did, but we relaxed '.*-names$' at some 
point. I'm going to fix that now.

Rob