linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: add support for IPQ5321

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 08:22:47 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@...nel.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: add support for IPQ5321

On 06/03/2024 05:40, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
>>>
>>> Applied. Thanks.
>>
>> Dropped since the previous commit it required too. Can we get the
>> necessary acks for me to pick those ?
>>
> 
> Sorry for not mentioning the dependencies.
> 
> patch 1/3 and 2/3 are already has the R-b and A-b tags. But typically 

>From whom? Not from Qualcomm SoC maintainers.

> those patches will go via qcom tree. Do you want to pick it via your 
> tree? Sorry, I'm not sure on this...

Your cover letter or patch changelog should clearly document
dependencies, so maintainers could understand what to do with this patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof