[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZegrMMTehDk2e4A8@wunner.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:37:04 +0100
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@....com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel v2] pci/doe: Support discovery version
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:02:27PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 28/2/24 07:41, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > + u32 disver = FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_DISCOVER_VER,
> > > + (capver >= 2) ? 2 : 0);
> > > u32 request_pl = FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX,
> > > - *index);
> > > + *index) | disver;
> >
> > Hm, why use a separate "disver" variable? This could be combined
> > into a single statement.
>
> Less ugly since we want to keep it 80 chars long
I don't quite follow, this stays exactly within 80 chars:
u32 request_pl = FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX,
- *index);
+ *index) |
+ FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_DISCOVER_VER,
+ (capver >= 2) ? 2 : 0);
And if you replace DISCOVER_VER with VERSION as I've suggested,
it becomes even shorter:
u32 request_pl = FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_INDEX,
- *index);
+ *index) |
+ FIELD_PREP(PCI_DOE_DATA_OBJECT_DISC_REQ_3_VERSION,
+ (capver >= 2) ? 2 : 0);
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists