linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] fuse: remove an unnecessary if statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJfpegtnTafRiHGG6jpZaZ_XbOhT2aGFyZM3FeDdPoSSEanNNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:13:29 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Jiachen Zhang <zhangjiachen.jaycee@...edance.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, me@...x.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fuse: remove an unnecessary if statement

On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 10:47, Jiachen Zhang
<zhangjiachen.jaycee@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> FUSE remote locking code paths never add any locking state to
> inode->i_flctx, so the locks_remove_posix() function called on
> file close will return without calling fuse_setlk().
>
> Therefore, as the if statement to be removed in this commit will
> always be false, remove it for clearness.
>
> Fixes: 7142125937e1 ("[PATCH] fuse: add POSIX file locking support")
> Signed-off-by: Jiachen Zhang <zhangjiachen.jaycee@...edance.com>

Applied, thanks.

Miklos