lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJprsZz08Otk8hUxu3tQLXen2a3xeW58HLbNSSm=d2OAWkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:19:45 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, 
	Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, 
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Krzysztof WilczyƄski <kw@...ux.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: PCIe fixes and GICv3
 ITS enable

On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 11:12, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 10:48:30AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 10:39, Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 08:20:16AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 12:03:02PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>
> > > > > Just received confirmation from Qcom that L0s is not supported for any of the
> > > > > PCIe instances in sc8280xp (and its derivatives). Please move the property to
> > > > > SoC dtsi.
>
> > > > Ok, thanks for confirming. But then the devicetree property is not the
> > > > right way to handle this, and we should disable L0s based on the
> > > > compatible string instead.
>
> > > Hmm. I checked further and got the info that there is no change in the IP, but
> > > the PHY sequence is not tuned correctly for L0s (as I suspected earlier). So
> > > there will be AERs when L0s is enabled on any controller instance. And there
> > > will be no updated PHY sequence in the future also for this chipset.
> >
> > Why? If it is a bug in the PHY driver, it should be fixed there
> > instead of adding workarounds.
>
> ASPM L0s is currently broken on these platforms and, as far as I
> understand, both under Windows and Linux. Since Qualcomm hasn't been
> able to come up with the necessary PHY init sequences for these
> platforms yet, I doubt they will suddenly appear in the near future.

I see. Ok, I retract my comment.

>
> So we need to disable L0s for now. If an updated PHY init sequence later
> appears, we can always enable it again.
>
> > > So yeah, let's disable it in the driver instead.
>
> Johan



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ