[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CZMKBOH0BBTH.MZH1OTAZC7HH@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 10:34:08 +0100
From: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
To: "Andi Shyti" <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "Rob Herring"
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, "Gregory Clement"
<gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, "Vladimir Kondratiev"
<vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>, "Thomas Petazzoni"
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, "Tawfik Bayouk"
<tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>, "Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@...e.com>, "Guenter
Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>, <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Add Mobileye EyeQ5 support to the Nomadik I2C
controller & use hrtimers for timeouts
Hello Andi,
On Wed Mar 6, 2024 at 2:49 AM CET, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Théo Lebrun (11):
> > dt-bindings: i2c: nomadik: add mobileye,eyeq5-i2c bindings and example
> > dt-bindings: hwmon: lm75: use common hwmon schema
> > i2c: nomadik: rename private struct pointers from dev to priv
> > i2c: nomadik: simplify IRQ masking logic
> > i2c: nomadik: use bitops helpers
> > i2c: nomadik: support short xfer timeouts using waitqueue & hrtimer
> > i2c: nomadik: replace jiffies by ktime for FIFO flushing timeout
> > i2c: nomadik: fetch i2c-transfer-timeout-us property from devicetree
> > i2c: nomadik: support Mobileye EyeQ5 I2C controller
> > MIPS: mobileye: eyeq5: add 5 I2C controller nodes
> > MIPS: mobileye: eyeq5: add evaluation board I2C temp sensor
>
> what's your plan for this series? If you extract into a separate
> series the refactoring patches that are not dependent on the
> bindings I could queue them up for the merge window.
V3 is ready and will be sent today. I think we can get trailers from
dt-bindings maintainers as the discussion has been caried out on this
revision.
Am I being too optimistic of seeing this series queued before the merge
window?
Thanks Andi,
--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists