lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ebe234db-73e0-46db-b377-6b9f960597c8@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:48:11 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
 Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
 Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, Andy Gross
 <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
 Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
 Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
 linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/20] media: venus: pm_helpers: Rename core_clks_get
 to venus_clks_get

On 09/02/2024 21:09, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> "core" is used in multiple contexts when talking about Venus, rename
> the function to save on confusion.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
> index 8bd0ce4ce69d..ac7c83404c6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
>   
>   static bool legacy_binding;
>   
> -static int core_clks_get(struct venus_core *core)
> +static int venus_clks_get(struct venus_core *core)
>   {
>   	const struct venus_resources *res = core->res;
>   	struct device *dev = core->dev;
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static int core_get_v1(struct venus_core *core)
>   {
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	ret = core_clks_get(core);
> +	ret = venus_clks_get(core);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>   
> @@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ static int core_get_v4(struct venus_core *core)
>   	const struct venus_resources *res = core->res;
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	ret = core_clks_get(core);
> +	ret = venus_clks_get(core);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>   
> 

We have vcodec_clks_get(). It seems a bit nit-picky but if you are 
tidying up the namepsace, then I'd suggest venus_core_clks_get() or 
vcore_clks_get().

Seems more consistent.

---
bod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ