lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYS-5mDjNP2zJ2J=_k_uboyVGK61Z1XWHcUh26HT6WKmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 14:03:47 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: "Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries" <jorge@...ndries.io>
Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, 
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@...ark-techno.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: part_switch: fixes switch on gp3 partition

On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 10:05 AM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
<jorge@...ndries.io> wrote:

> That looked strange as there should be support for 4 GP but this code
> kind of convinced me of the opposite.
>
>         if (idata->rpmb) {
>                 /* Support multiple RPMB partitions */
>                 target_part = idata->rpmb->part_index;
>                 target_part |= EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_RPMB;
>         }
>
> So if we apply the fix that you propose, how are multiple RPMB
> partitions (ie, 4) going to be identified as RPMB? Unless there can't be
> more than 3?

Sorry for writing bad code comments.

This comment means:

"support multiple RPMB partitions [on the same Linux system]"

not:

"support multiple RPMB partitions [on the same eMMC device]"

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ