linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] nvme-fc: fix blktests nvme/041

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 15:35:39 +0100
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, 
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] nvme-fc: fix blktests nvme/041

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:04:13AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 02:23:59PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > As suggested by Keith I've merged the new flag for nvme-fabrics with the last
> > patch. I also added some information why nvme-fc is handling the initial connect
> > attempt differently as requested by Christoph.
> > 
> > The new flag is called connect_async and the default is false/0. I've tested
> > with a patched nvme-cli/libnvme version and all looks good. When this series is
> > accepted I'll update nvme-cli/libnvme accordingly. Note, that even with an older
> > nvme-cli the blktests (especially nvme/041) will pass with a newer kernel.
> > 
> > (nvme/048 is still fails but this is a different problem. On my TODO list)
> 
> Series looks good to me. Sounds like it's not fixing any regressions, so
> I think this goes to the 6.9 branch. I'll wait till end of week for any
> other feedback before pushing anything out.

The second patch should be dropped in this series and replaced with the
patches from Hannes '[PATCH 0/4] nvme: fixes for authentication errors'

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20240301112823.132570-1-hare@kernel.org/

Should I send out new version or do you take it from here?