lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240306213453.72f9a925@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:34:53 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Sam Sun <samsun1006219@...il.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller@...glegroups.com,
 xrivendell7@...il.com, ardb@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Paolo Bonzini
 <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug] WARNING in static_key_disable_cpuslocked

On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 17:30:09 -0800
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org> wrote:

> So, I think we can simplify this nicely by getting rid of the whole -1
> thing altogether:
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/jump_label.c b/kernel/jump_label.c
> index d9c822bbffb8..ef7eda7685b2 100644
> --- a/kernel/jump_label.c
> +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c
> @@ -194,20 +194,15 @@ void static_key_enable_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key)
>  	STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key);
>  	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
>  
> -	if (atomic_read(&key->enabled) > 0) {
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&key->enabled) != 1);
> +	if (atomic_read(&key->enabled) == 1)
>  		return;
> -	}
> -
>  	jump_label_lock();
> -	if (atomic_read(&key->enabled) == 0) {
> -		atomic_set(&key->enabled, -1);
> +
> +	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 0, 1) == 0)
>  		jump_label_update(key);
> -		/*
> -		 * See static_key_slow_inc().
> -		 */
> -		atomic_set_release(&key->enabled, 1);
> -	}
> +	else
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&key->enabled) != 1);
> +
>  	jump_label_unlock();

You may be able to clean it up more with:

	int tmp;

	tmp = atomic_read(&key->enabled);
	if (tmp == 1)
		return;

	jump_label_lock();

	if (!tmp && atomic_try_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, &tmp, 1))
		jump_label_update(key);
	else
		WARN_ON_ONCE(tmp != 1);

	jump_label_unlock();

 ;-)

-- Steve


>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(static_key_enable_cpuslocked);
> @@ -225,14 +220,16 @@ void static_key_disable_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key)
>  	STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key);
>  	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
>  
> -	if (atomic_read(&key->enabled) != 1) {
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&key->enabled) != 0);
> +	if (atomic_read(&key->enabled) == 0)
>  		return;
> -	}
>  
>  	jump_label_lock();
> -	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0))
> +
> +	if (atomic_cmpxchg(&key->enabled, 1, 0) == 1)
>  		jump_label_update(key);
> +	else
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&key->enabled) != 0);
> +
>  	jump_label_unlock();
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(static_key_disable_cpuslocked);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ