| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZenxnY83dnYIT9dJ@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 11:55:57 -0500
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, john.g.garry@...cle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, mike.leach@...aro.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] perf: imx_perf: refactor driver for imx93
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 05:57:27PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote:
> This driver is initinally used to support imx93 Soc and now it's time to
> add support for imx95 Soc. However, some macro definitions and events are
> different on these two Socs. For preparing imx95 supports, this will
> refactor driver for imx93.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com>
>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - new patch
> Changes in v5:
> - use is_visible to hide unwanted attributes as suggested by Will
> Changes in v6:
> - improve imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config()
> ---
> drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> index 8d85b4d98544..4e8a3a4349c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> @@ -11,14 +11,14 @@
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>
> /* Performance monitor configuration */
> -#define PMCFG1 0x00
> -#define PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(31)
> -#define PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(30)
> -#define PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN BIT(29)
> -#define PMCFG1_ID_MASK GENMASK(17, 0)
> +#define PMCFG1 0x00
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(31)
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(30)
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN BIT(29)
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK GENMASK(17, 0)
>
> -#define PMCFG2 0x04
> -#define PMCFG2_ID GENMASK(17, 0)
> +#define PMCFG2 0x04
> +#define MX93_PMCFG2_ID GENMASK(17, 0)
>
> /* Global control register affects all counters and takes priority over local control registers */
> #define PMGC0 0x40
> @@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ static const struct imx_ddr_devtype_data imx93_devtype_data = {
> .identifier = "imx93",
> };
>
> +static inline bool is_imx93(struct ddr_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> + return pmu->devtype_data == &imx93_devtype_data;
> +}
> +
> static const struct of_device_id imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids[] = {
> {.compatible = "fsl,imx93-ddr-pmu", .data = &imx93_devtype_data},
> { /* sentinel */ }
> @@ -186,7 +191,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_ld_wiq_6, ID(2, 70)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_ld_wiq_7, ID(2, 71)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_empty, ID(2, 72)),
> - IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt, ID(2, 73)),
> + IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt, ID(2, 73)), /* imx93 specific*/
>
> /* counter3 specific events */
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_0, ID(3, 64)),
> @@ -198,7 +203,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_6, ID(3, 70)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_7, ID(3, 71)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_full, ID(3, 72)),
> - IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt, ID(3, 73)),
> + IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt, ID(3, 73)), /* imx93 specific*/
>
> /* counter4 specific events */
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_0, ID(4, 64)),
> @@ -210,7 +215,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_6, ID(4, 70)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_7, ID(4, 71)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_ld_rdq2_rmw, ID(4, 72)),
> - IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt, ID(4, 73)),
> + IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt, ID(4, 73)), /* imx93 specific*/
>
> /* counter5 specific events */
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_valid_start_0, ID(5, 64)),
> @@ -245,9 +250,26 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> NULL,
> };
>
> +static umode_t
> +ddr_perf_events_attrs_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct attribute *attr, int unused)
> +{
> + struct pmu *pmu = dev_get_drvdata(kobj_to_dev(kobj));
> + struct ddr_pmu *ddr_pmu = to_ddr_pmu(pmu);
> +
> + if ((!strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt") ||
> + !strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt") ||
> + !strcmp(attr->name, "eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt")) &&
> + !is_imx93(ddr_pmu))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return attr->mode;
> +}
> +
> static const struct attribute_group ddr_perf_events_attr_group = {
> .name = "events",
> .attrs = ddr_perf_events_attrs,
> + .is_visible = ddr_perf_events_attrs_is_visible,
> };
>
> PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-15");
> @@ -369,36 +391,47 @@ static void ddr_perf_counter_local_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int config,
> }
> }
>
> -static void ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int event,
> - int counter, int axi_id, int axi_mask)
> +static void imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int event,
> + int counter, int axi_id, int axi_mask)
> {
> u32 pmcfg1, pmcfg2;
>
> pmcfg1 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG1);
>
> - if (counter == 2 && event == 73)
> - pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> - else if (counter == 2 && event != 73)
> - pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> -
> - if (counter == 3 && event == 73)
> - pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> - else if (counter == 3 && event != 73)
> - pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> -
> - if (counter == 4 && event == 73)
> - pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
> - else if (counter == 4 && event != 73)
> - pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
> + if (event == 73) {
> + switch (counter) {
> + case 2:
> + pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> + break;
> + case 4:
> + pmcfg1 |= MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
> + break;
> + }
> + } else {
> + switch (counter) {
> + case 2:
> + pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> + break;
> + case 4:
> + pmcfg1 &= ~MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
how about
u32 mask[] = { MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN,
MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN,
MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN
};
if (couter >=2 && counter <= 4)
event == 73 ? pmcfg1 |= mask[counter - 2] :
pmcfg1 &= ~mask[counter - 2];
Frank
>
> - pmcfg1 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, 0x3FFFF);
> - pmcfg1 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, axi_mask);
> - writel(pmcfg1, pmu->base + PMCFG1);
> + pmcfg1 &= ~FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK, 0x3FFFF);
> + pmcfg1 |= FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK, axi_mask);
> + writel_relaxed(pmcfg1, pmu->base + PMCFG1);
>
> pmcfg2 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> - pmcfg2 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, 0x3FFFF);
> - pmcfg2 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, axi_id);
> - writel(pmcfg2, pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> + pmcfg2 &= ~FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG2_ID, 0x3FFFF);
> + pmcfg2 |= FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG2_ID, axi_id);
> + writel_relaxed(pmcfg2, pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> }
>
> static void ddr_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> @@ -514,7 +547,7 @@ static int ddr_perf_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> ddr_perf_event_start(event, flags);
>
> /* read trans, write trans, read beat */
> - ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, event_id, counter, cfg1, cfg2);
> + imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, event_id, counter, cfg1, cfg2);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists